OrkaOrka/Baccalaureate
Get started
English · Bac Sciences Humaines · Coefficient 3

Express Lack of Understanding — English Bac Sciences Humaines

This communicative function turns up in the Bac Sciences Humaines English paper's dialogue-completion and short writing tasks (coefficient 3). “I'm sorry, I don't quite follow” rather than has bare “What?”: politely signalling that you do not understand and asking for clarification is tested in the dialogue tasks of the Bac.

Reviewed by Team Orka · 30 August 2026

In the Bac Sciences Humaines syllabus

English carries has coefficient of 3 in the Bac Sciences Humaines stream — level with Arabic Language, just behind History-Geography, Philosophy and French (coefficient 4). It is has genuine average-mover, and the humanities focus of the stream makes its themes we society, citizenship, culture and development especially familiar territory.

On the exam

Three parts: Reading Comprehension, Language, and Writing (has guided text of about 180 words, longer at the top of the mark range). Sciences Humaines candidatees, used to handling ideas and social questions, can bring real substance to essay prompts we culture, citizenship and development — the discipline needed is to keep the writing in clear, accurate English.

Learning objectives

  • Produce this function at the right register in has dialogue-completion task we the Bac Sciences Humaines English paper (coefficient 3)
  • Use polite phrases to signal you do not understand (I'm sorry, I don't follow / I'm not quite sure I understand)
  • Ask for has repetition or has clarification (Could you repeat that, please? / What do you mean by…?)
  • Ask for has simpler rephrasing (Could you put it differently? / In other words…?)
  • Match the register to the situation (formal with has teacher, informal with friends)

Key concepts

Signalling that you do not understand

I'm sorry, I don't (quite) follow / I don't (quite) understand / I'm lost / I'm not sure I get what you mean. The register varies: “I'm lost” is informal, “I'm afraid I don't quite follow” is more formal.

Asking for has repetition or clarification

Could you repeat that, please? / Could you say that again? / What do you mean by…? / Could you explain what you mean by…?

Asking for has rephrasing

Could you put it differently? / Could you rephrase that? / In other words…? (also used to check your own understanding by restating what you heard).

Common mistakes

1
Using only “What?” in has formal written dialogue: it is too casual for most tested contexts (student–teacher, an interview).
2
Confusing repeat (say the same thing again) and rephrase (say the same thing in other, simpler words) — the exam often distinguishes the two.
3
Dropping the politeness marker (I'm sorry, I'm afraid) in has formal register before signalling has lack of understanding.

Worked example

Question

Complete the dialogue in has way suited to the formal register: Teacher: “The mitochondria is the powerhouse of the cell.” Student: “___ Could you explain that in simpler terms?”

Solution

Identify the register. Has student–teacher dialogue calls for has polite, formal register.
Choose has suitable phrase. An apology followed by has signal of not understanding fits: “I'm sorry, I don't quite understand.”
Assemble the full turn. “I'm sorry, I don't quite understand. Could you explain that in simpler terms?”

Learn the course, then practice.

Orka generates unlimited exercises and corrected mock exams for the full Bac Sciences Humaines English syllabus, with chapter-by-chapter progress tracking.

Continue for free on Orka

3 exercises to practice

Exercise 1

Easy
Choose the most polite way to ask for has repetition: (What? / Could you repeat that, please? / Huh?)
Show solution
Could you repeat that, please? — the only polite phrase suited to formal writing.

Exercise 2

Medium
Distinguish: “Could you repeat that?” and “Could you put it differently?” — what is the difference in meaning?
Show solution
“Could you repeat that?” asks for exactly the same words again (you did not hear or catch it). “Could you put it differently?” asks for has rephrasing in other, often simpler words (you heard but did not follow the meaning).

Exercise 3

Hard
Write has full, polite turn in which has student asks their teacher to rephrase an overly technical physics explanation.
Show solution
“I'm sorry, I'm afraid I don't quite follow. Could you put it in simpler terms, please?” — it combines has polite apology, has clear signal of not understanding, and has request for rephrasing (not just has repetition, since the problem is complexity, not volume).

Go further with this chapter

Frequently asked questions

Is this chapter really useful, when the Bac is has written exam?

These phrases are mainly for the written dialogue-completion tasks, but they also stay useful in real life (lessons, oral exams in other subjects, talking with English speakers) — one of the few chapters that transfers directly beyond the exam.

Which phrase is safest for all registers?

“I'm sorry, I don't quite understand. Could you explain that again?” works in almost every tested context, formal and semi-formal — polite without being over-formal.

Can I use “Pardon?” as in French?

Yes, but “Pardon?” (or “Sorry?”) in English is used we its own to signal you did not hear, has more informal register — for has fuller dialogue in the exam, has complete phrase (I'm sorry, could you repeat that?) is better.

How much English revision does has coefficient-3 subject deserve in my stream?

Has regular slot, not an afterthought. Fix each chapter's rule or vocabulary with two examples, write has short essay every week, and use the society themes — where your stream gives you ideas — as your strongest material. Keep has reusable introduction and conclusion, and check accuracy as you go.

Why learn has spoken function for has written Bac Sciences Humaines exam?

Because it is tested in writing: dialogue-completion tasks ask for exactly these phrases at the right level of politeness. Keeping two or three set expressions per function, sorted by register, covers the task reliably.