Dans le programme du Bac Éco
English has a coefficient of 2 in the Bac Sciences Économiques stream, the same weight as Philosophy and Law. It sits behind the professional subjects (General Economics and Accounting, coefficient 6; Business Organisation, coefficient 3; Applied Mathematics, coefficient 4). The stream's grounding in institutions and collective behaviour makes the English themes on citizenship, organisations and development familiar ground.
À l'épreuve
Three parts: Reading Comprehension, Language, and Writing (about 180 words). Economics candidates are used to analysing collective phenomena and institutions, which helps on essay prompts about international organisations, brain drain or sustainable development — provided the answer stays in plain English, not economics jargon.
Objectifs d'apprentissage
- Apply this grammar point accurately in the Language section and in the guided writing of the Bac Éco English exam (coefficient 2)
- Choose the right relative pronoun by function (who / whom for people, which for things, whose for possession, where for a place)
- Distinguish a defining clause from a non-defining clause
- Know when that can replace who / which and when it is forbidden
- Omit the object relative pronoun correctly in a defining clause
Notions clés
Choosing the relative pronoun
Defining clauses
Non-defining clauses
Erreurs fréquentes
Using that after a comma (non-defining clause): “My car, that is red, …” is wrong — use which.
Omitting the subject relative pronoun: “The man is here lives next door” is wrong — a subject pronoun is needed (who / that): “The man who lives next door is here.”
Confusing whose (possession) with who's (contraction of who is): two different words despite the identical pronunciation.
Exemple corrigé
Énoncé
Correction
Le cours, puis l'entraînement.
Orka génère des exercices illimités et des examens blancs corrigés sur tout le programme de Anglais du Bac Éco, avec un suivi de ta progression chapitre par chapitre.
Continue gratuitement sur Orka3 exercices pour t'entraîner
Exercice 1
EasyVoir la correction
Exercice 2
MediumVoir la correction
Exercice 3
HardVoir la correction
Va plus loin sur ce chapitre
50+ exercices interactifs sur ce chapitre
Générés et corrigés étape par étape par l’IA, à ton niveau.
Quiz IA adaptatif
Questions qui s’ajustent automatiquement à tes réussites et erreurs.
Corrigés d’annales sur ce chapitre
Sujets d’examens nationaux et régionaux déjà tombés.
Plan de révision personnalisé
Priorise ce chapitre selon ta progression réelle sur toute la filière.
Flashcards du chapitre
Formules et définitions clés en mode révision rapide.
Tuteur IA en Darija
Pose tes questions sur ce chapitre et obtiens une explication immédiate.
Questions fréquentes
When can I omit the relative pronoun?
Only in a defining clause where the pronoun works as an object: “The book (that) I read” (that is the object of read). You can never omit a subject relative pronoun or a pronoun in a non-defining clause.
Can which replace that everywhere?
which replaces that in defining clauses about a thing, but only which (never that) is possible in a non-defining clause, the one set off by commas.
How do I recognise a non-defining clause in writing?
It is always set off by commas and could be removed without changing the essential meaning — it only adds extra information, often about a proper noun or an already-identified noun.
How do I fit English revision around the economics and accounting subjects?
A short weekly session: one chapter (rule or word list, two examples), then a short paragraph. Focus especially on the society themes — citizenship, international organisations, development — which are close to your other subjects, and keep a model introduction and conclusion ready. A mark above your average is within reach.
Is this grammar point actually tested on the Bac Éco English paper?
Yes — in the Language section as gap-fill, sentence-joining or error-correction, and indirectly in Writing, where the same structures decide whether a sentence is marked as accurate. One rule, two examples and one typical mistake per point is enough to cover both.
