Dans le programme du Bac SMB
English carries a coefficient of 2 in the Bac Sciences Maths B (SMB) stream, level with Philosophy. Mathematics dominates the stream (coefficient 9), followed by Physics-Chemistry and Engineering Sciences (coefficient 7 each), so English can look marginal — but it and Philosophy form the narrow margin where rankings and honours are actually decided. Reading, language and guided writing are all assessed.
À l'épreuve
Three parts: Reading Comprehension, Language, and Writing (a guided text of about 180 words). SMB candidates, trained to be rigorous and systematic, do well on the Language section if they treat each grammar point as a rule with a fixed structure; the risk is a dry essay that ignores vocabulary range and register, which the Writing section also scores.
Objectifs d'apprentissage
- Apply this grammar point accurately in the Language section and in the guided writing of the Bac SMB English exam (coefficient 2)
- Form the past perfect continuous: had been + verb-ing
- Identify a duration up to a past point, marked by for or since
- Distinguish the past perfect simple (result) from the past perfect continuous (ongoing duration)
- Recognise state verbs (know, believe, want) that stay in the past perfect simple
Notions clés
Form
Use: duration up to a past point
Past perfect simple vs continuous
Erreurs fréquentes
Forgetting been: “had working” is wrong — use “had been working”.
Using for with a precise starting point (since is needed): “for 2019” is wrong — say “since 2019” or “for X years”.
Using the past perfect continuous with non-progressive state verbs (know, believe, want): keep the past perfect simple (“had known”, not “had been knowing”).
Exemple corrigé
Énoncé
Correction
Le cours, puis l'entraînement.
Orka génère des exercices illimités et des examens blancs corrigés sur tout le programme de Anglais du Bac SMB, avec un suivi de ta progression chapitre par chapitre.
Continue gratuitement sur Orka3 exercices pour t'entraîner
Exercice 1
EasyVoir la correction
Exercice 2
MediumVoir la correction
Exercice 3
HardVoir la correction
Va plus loin sur ce chapitre
50+ exercices interactifs sur ce chapitre
Générés et corrigés étape par étape par l’IA, à ton niveau.
Quiz IA adaptatif
Questions qui s’ajustent automatiquement à tes réussites et erreurs.
Corrigés d’annales sur ce chapitre
Sujets d’examens nationaux et régionaux déjà tombés.
Plan de révision personnalisé
Priorise ce chapitre selon ta progression réelle sur toute la filière.
Flashcards du chapitre
Formules et définitions clés en mode révision rapide.
Tuteur IA en Darija
Pose tes questions sur ce chapitre et obtiens une explication immédiate.
Questions fréquentes
When do I choose the past perfect continuous rather than the simple?
When the stress is on the DURATION of the action up to a past point (often with for / since), not just on the fact that it was finished. With no explicit duration marker, the past perfect simple is enough.
Can for and since be used interchangeably?
No: for is followed by a length of time (for three hours, for two years), since by a precise starting point (since 2019, since Monday, since she arrived).
Why do some verbs have no continuous form?
State verbs (know, believe, want, love, own, understand) describe a permanent state rather than an action in progress; they stay in the simple form, including the past perfect (had known, never had been knowing).
A maths-stream student often dislikes English — how do they raise the mark?
Treat it as structure. Every writing task = introduction + argument + counter-argument + conclusion; every grammar point = one rule + one correct example + one typical mistake. Memorise that framework, apply it to the 31 chapters with two example sentences each, and 12/20 is reachable without eating into the heavy maths programme.
Is this grammar point actually tested on the Bac SMB English paper?
Yes — in the Language section as gap-fill, sentence-joining or error-correction, and indirectly in Writing, where the same structures decide whether a sentence is marked as accurate. One rule, two examples and one typical mistake per point is enough to cover both.
