Dans le programme du Bac Agro
English carries a coefficient of 2 in the Bac Sciences Agronomiques stream, level with Philosophy. The stream is built on Mathematics (coefficient 7), then Physics-Chemistry, Life & Earth Sciences and Plant & Animal Sciences (coefficient 5 each). English plays the role of a mark-mover in the average rather than a make-or-break subject, but its themes on the environment and development connect naturally to the stream's science content.
À l'épreuve
Three parts: Reading Comprehension, Language, and Writing (about 180 words). The habit of thinking in systems — soil, plant, animal, climate — helps Agro candidates handle essay prompts on sustainable development and the environment, where a concrete, well-chosen example beats a list of vague ones.
Objectifs d'apprentissage
- Apply this grammar point accurately in the Language section and in the guided writing of the Bac Agro English exam (coefficient 2)
- Form the past perfect continuous: had been + verb-ing
- Identify a duration up to a past point, marked by for or since
- Distinguish the past perfect simple (result) from the past perfect continuous (ongoing duration)
- Recognise state verbs (know, believe, want) that stay in the past perfect simple
Notions clés
Form
Use: duration up to a past point
Past perfect simple vs continuous
Erreurs fréquentes
Forgetting been: “had working” is wrong — use “had been working”.
Using for with a precise starting point (since is needed): “for 2019” is wrong — say “since 2019” or “for X years”.
Using the past perfect continuous with non-progressive state verbs (know, believe, want): keep the past perfect simple (“had known”, not “had been knowing”).
Exemple corrigé
Énoncé
Correction
Le cours, puis l'entraînement.
Orka génère des exercices illimités et des examens blancs corrigés sur tout le programme de Anglais du Bac Agro, avec un suivi de ta progression chapitre par chapitre.
Continue gratuitement sur Orka3 exercices pour t'entraîner
Exercice 1
EasyVoir la correction
Exercice 2
MediumVoir la correction
Exercice 3
HardVoir la correction
Va plus loin sur ce chapitre
50+ exercices interactifs sur ce chapitre
Générés et corrigés étape par étape par l’IA, à ton niveau.
Quiz IA adaptatif
Questions qui s’ajustent automatiquement à tes réussites et erreurs.
Corrigés d’annales sur ce chapitre
Sujets d’examens nationaux et régionaux déjà tombés.
Plan de révision personnalisé
Priorise ce chapitre selon ta progression réelle sur toute la filière.
Flashcards du chapitre
Formules et définitions clés en mode révision rapide.
Tuteur IA en Darija
Pose tes questions sur ce chapitre et obtiens une explication immédiate.
Questions fréquentes
When do I choose the past perfect continuous rather than the simple?
When the stress is on the DURATION of the action up to a past point (often with for / since), not just on the fact that it was finished. With no explicit duration marker, the past perfect simple is enough.
Can for and since be used interchangeably?
No: for is followed by a length of time (for three hours, for two years), since by a precise starting point (since 2019, since Monday, since she arrived).
Why do some verbs have no continuous form?
State verbs (know, believe, want, love, own, understand) describe a permanent state rather than an action in progress; they stay in the simple form, including the past perfect (had known, never had been knowing).
English is only coefficient 2 in my stream — is it worth revision time?
Yes. A mark in English weighs in the average exactly like a mark in a science subject at coefficient 2, and it is usually easier to raise because it rests on method, not on accumulated knowledge. One organised weekly session — chapter, rule or words, example, short paragraph — is enough.
Is this grammar point actually tested on the Bac Agro English paper?
Yes — in the Language section as gap-fill, sentence-joining or error-correction, and indirectly in Writing, where the same structures decide whether a sentence is marked as accurate. One rule, two examples and one typical mistake per point is enough to cover both.
