OrkaOrka/Bac/Sciences de Gestion Comptable (SGC)
Anglais · Bac SGC · Coefficient 2

The Past Perfect Continuous — English Bac SGC

In the Bac SGC stream, where English is coefficient 2, the Language section rewards precise grammar with quick marks. “She had been working for three hours when the power went out”: the past perfect continuous stages the duration of an action in progress before another past event.

Relu par Équipe Orka · 30 août 2026

Dans le programme du Bac SGC

English carries a coefficient of 2 in the Bac Sciences de Gestion Comptable (SGC) stream — far behind Accounting (coefficient 8) and Business Organisation (coefficient 6), and level with Philosophy and Law. It is part of the margin that decides rankings and honours, and its mark is raised by method rather than by volume.

À l'épreuve

Three parts: Reading Comprehension, Language, and Writing (about 180 words). An accountant's discipline in ordering and justifying entries transfers to a well-ordered essay plan and a clearly sequenced argument.

Objectifs d'apprentissage

  • Apply this grammar point accurately in the Language section and in the guided writing of the Bac SGC English exam (coefficient 2)
  • Form the past perfect continuous: had been + verb-ing
  • Identify a duration up to a past point, marked by for or since
  • Distinguish the past perfect simple (result) from the past perfect continuous (ongoing duration)
  • Recognise state verbs (know, believe, want) that stay in the past perfect simple

Notions clés

Form

had been + verb-ing. Negative: hadn't been + verb-ing. Question: Had + subject + been + verb-ing?

Use: duration up to a past point

It stresses the duration of an action in progress up to a moment in the past, often with for (duration) or since (starting point). E.g. “She had been working for three hours when the power went out.”

Past perfect simple vs continuous

The simple stresses the result or completion (had finished). The continuous stresses the duration or the ongoing action (had been working). State verbs (know, believe, want, own) never take the continuous form.

Erreurs fréquentes

1

Forgetting been: “had working” is wrong — use “had been working”.

2

Using for with a precise starting point (since is needed): “for 2019” is wrong — say “since 2019” or “for X years”.

3

Using the past perfect continuous with non-progressive state verbs (know, believe, want): keep the past perfect simple (“had known”, not “had been knowing”).

Exemple corrigé

Énoncé

Put the verb in brackets into the right form: “When I called her, she (study) for five hours already.”

Correction

Spot the duration. “For five hours” marks an ongoing duration up to the moment of the call (past reference point).
Choose the tense. Duration up to a past point is marked by the past perfect continuous: had been + verb-ing.
Result. “When I called her, she had been studying for five hours already.”

Le cours, puis l'entraînement.

Orka génère des exercices illimités et des examens blancs corrigés sur tout le programme de Anglais du Bac SGC, avec un suivi de ta progression chapitre par chapitre.

Continue gratuitement sur Orka

3 exercices pour t'entraîner

Exercice 1

Easy
Complete: “They (play) football for two hours when it started to rain.”
Voir la correction
“had been playing” — duration up to a past event (it started to rain), marked by for.

Exercice 2

Medium
Choose the more suitable form: “By the time he retired, he ___ for the company for thirty years.” (had worked / had been working)
Voir la correction
Both are grammatically possible, but “had been working” stresses the long ongoing duration (thirty years) while “had worked” stresses the completed fact. With such a marked duration, the exam usually expects had been working.

Exercice 3

Hard
Correct: “She had been knowing him for ten years before they got married.”
Voir la correction
Know is a state verb (non-progressive) and never takes the -ing form: “She had known him for ten years before they got married.”

Va plus loin sur ce chapitre

Questions fréquentes

When do I choose the past perfect continuous rather than the simple?

When the stress is on the DURATION of the action up to a past point (often with for / since), not just on the fact that it was finished. With no explicit duration marker, the past perfect simple is enough.

Can for and since be used interchangeably?

No: for is followed by a length of time (for three hours, for two years), since by a precise starting point (since 2019, since Monday, since she arrived).

Why do some verbs have no continuous form?

State verbs (know, believe, want, love, own, understand) describe a permanent state rather than an action in progress; they stay in the simple form, including the past perfect (had known, never had been knowing).

English is coefficient 2 against 8 for accounting — how do I balance them?

Do not drop it: a mark in English weighs in the average like a mark in any coefficient-2 subject, and raising it is a matter of method, not accumulation. One weekly session — chapter, rule or words, example, two short paragraphs — plus a fixed template for the introduction and conclusion is enough to secure the marks.

Is this grammar point actually tested on the Bac SGC English paper?

Yes — in the Language section as gap-fill, sentence-joining or error-correction, and indirectly in Writing, where the same structures decide whether a sentence is marked as accurate. One rule, two examples and one typical mistake per point is enough to cover both.